Inovação Aberta: Expandindo as Perspectivas de Análise

Sérgio Henrique de Oliveira Lima; Alandey Severo Leite da Silva; Tatiana Carvalho Ramos Cavalcanti

Autors/ores

Sérgio Henrique de Oliveira Lima
Alandey Severo Leite da Silva
Tatiana Carvalho Ramos Cavalcanti

Paraules clau:

Inovação aberta, Perspectivas, Taxonomia

Resum

O conceito de inovação aberta tem sido amplamente investigado na literatura de estudos organizacionais nos últimos anos. No entanto, algumas perspectivas pelas quais se pode estudar e compreender o fenômeno parecem ainda não exaustivamente discutidas. O objetivo do presente estudo foi apresentar uma discussão abrangente acerca das perspectivas da inovação aberta, a partir da classificação originalmente proposta por Gassmann, Enkel e Chesbrough em artigo publicado em 2010 [Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221], de modo a ampliar a atual compreensão sobre tais perspectivas. Dois esforços complementares foram empreendidos: primeiramente, a literatura existente foi revisitada para identificar estudos adicionais associados a cada perspectiva; procurou-se, além disso, conectar tais perspectivas visando a evidenciar suas interseções temáticas

Referències

Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107.

Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.

Albers, S., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). Strategic alliance structures: An organization design perspective. Journal of Management, 42(3), 582–614.

Albuquerque, E. M. (2004). Ideias fundadoras - apresentação: “The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective” de Christopher Freeman. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 3(1), 9–13.

Anzola-Román, P., Bayona-Sáez, C., & García-Marco, T. (2018). Organizational innovation, internal R&D and externally sourced innovation practices: Effects on technological innovation outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 91, 233–247.

Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Wright, M. (2014). Technology transfer in a global economy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 301–312.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.

Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226–244.

Belderbos, R., Gilsing, V., Lokshin, B., Carree, M., & Fernández Sastre, J. (2018). The antecedents of new R&D collaborations with different partner types: On the dynamics of past R&D collaboration and innovative performance. Long Range Planning, 51(2), 285–302.

Beretta, M., Björk, J., & Magnusson, M. (2018). Moderating ideation in web-enabled ideation systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(3), 389–409.

Bodas Freitas, I. M., Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2013). Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions. Research Policy, 42(1), 50–62.

Bodas Freitas, I. M., Marques, R. A., & Paula e Silva, E. M. (2013). University-industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443–453.

Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868.

Carayannis, E. G., & Meissner, D. (2017). Glocal targeted open innovation: challenges, opportunities and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 236–252.

Celadon, K. L. (2014). Knowledge integration and open innovation in the Brazilian cosmetics industry. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(3), 34–50.

Chesbrough, H. (2003a). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press.

Chesbrough, H. (2003b). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.

Chesbrough, H. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22–28.

Christensen, C. M. (2001). O dilema da inovação: quando as novas tecnologias levam empresas ao fracasso. São Paulo: M.Books.

Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197–218.

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

Collinson, S., & Liu, Y. (2019). Recombination for innovation: performance outcomes from international partnerships in China. R&D Management, 49(1), 46–63.

Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A Resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477–501.

D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313.

Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709.

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.

Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120–1171.

Dosi, G. (1997). Opportunities, incentives and collective patterns of technological change. Economic Journal, 107(444), 1530–1547.

Edmondson, G., Valigra, L., Kenward, M., Hudson, R. L., & Belfield, H. (2012). Making industry-university partnerships work: lessons from successful collaborations. Business Innovation Board AISBL. Brussels.

Erosa, V. E. (2012). Dealing with cultural issues in the triple helix model implementation: A comparison among government, university and business culture. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 25–34.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

Eun, J.-H., Lee, K., & Wu, G. (2006). Explaining the “university-run enterprises” in China: a theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy, 35(9), 1329–1346.

Fagerberg, J. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature.

Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., & O’Reilly, P. (2012). “Orchestrating” sustainable crowdsourcing: A characterisation of solver brokerages. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(3), 216–232.

Freeman, C. (1979). The determinants of innovation: Market demand, technology, and the response to social problems. Futures, 11(3), 206–215.

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.

Freeman, C. (1995). The “National System of Innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.

Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems: complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211.

Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. (2011). Customer empowerment in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 17–32.

Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. In Annals of the R&D Management Conference (pp. 1–18). Lisboa, Portugal.

Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.

Gatautis, R., & Vitkauskaite, E. (2014). Crowdsourcing application in marketing activities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 1243–1250.

Gonçalves, E., & Fajardo, B. de A. G. (2011). A influência da proximidade tecnológica e geográfica sobre a inovação regional no Brasil. Revista de Economia ContemporâNea, 15(1), 112–142.

Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review.

Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371–385.

Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). External sources of innovative capabilities: The preference for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 167–188.

Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Special Issue: Global Strategy), 83–103.

Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163–3192.

Hong, W., & Su, Y.-S. (2013). The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university-industry collaborations: an analysis based on Chinese patent data. Research Policy, 42(2), 454–464.

Hossain, M., & Kauranen, I. (2015). Crowdsourcing: a comprehensive literature review. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 8(1), 2–22.

Howe, J. (2009). O poder das multidões: por que a força da coletividade está remodelando o futuro dos negócios. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Howells, J., Ramlogan, R., & Cheng, S.-L. (2012). Innovation and university collaboration: paradox and complexity within the knowledge economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3), 703–721.

Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2–9.

Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.

Johnsen, T., Phillips, W., Caldwell, N., & Lewis, M. (2006). Centrality of customer and supplier interaction in innovation. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 671–678.

Johnson, B., Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2003). Economic Development and the National System of Innovation Approach. In Annals of First Globelics Conference. Rio de Janeiro: Globelics Conference.

Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–19.

Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). A estratégia do oceano azul: como criar novos mercados e tornar a concorrência irrelevante. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2010). Marketing 3.0: as forças que estão definindo o novo marketing centrado no ser humano. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286.

Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). Triple helix of innovation: introduction. Science and Public Policy, 25(6), 358–364.

Lima, S. H. O., & Leocádio, Á. L. (2018). Mapping the international scientific production about open innovation. Brazilian Journal of Management & Innovation, 5(2), 181–208.

Lin, L., & Ho, Y. (2018). External technology sourcing through alliances and acquisitions: a technology interdependence perspective. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(11–12), 1381–1401.

List, F. (1909). The national system of political economy. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1985). Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Industrial Development Research.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369). New York: Pinter Publishers.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

Marjanovic, S., Fry, C., & Chataway, J. (2012). Crowdsourcing based business models: in search of evidence for innovation 2.0. Science and Public Policy, 39(3), 318–332.

Mazzali, L., & Costa, V. M. H. M. (1997). As formas de organização “em rede”: configuração e instrumento de análise da dinâmica industrial. Revista de Economia Política, 17(4), 121–139.

Möller, K., & Halinen, A. (2017). Managing business and innovation networks—From strategic nets to business fields and ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 5–22.

Mora-Valentin, E. M., Montoro-Sanchez, A., & Guerras-Martin, L. A. (2004). Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, 33(1), 17–40.

Mount, M., & Martinez, M. G. (2014). Social media: A tool for open innovation. California Management Review, 56(4), 124–143.

Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. N. (2006). Universities in national innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 209–239). Oxford: Oxford Publishing.

Naqshbandi, M. M., & Kamel, Y. (2017). Intervening role of realized absorptive capacity in organizational culture–openinnovation relationship: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of General Management, 42(3), 5–20.

Naqshbandi, M. M., Kaur, S., & Ma, P. (2015). What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation? Quality & Quantity, 49(5), 2123–2144.

Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6(1), 36–76.

Parkhe, A. (1991). Interfirm diversity, organizational learning and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(4), 579–601.

Penrose, E. T. (1995). The theory of the growth of the firm (3rd ed.). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.

Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3–4), 371–388.

Plewa, C., Korff, N., Johnson, C., MacPherson, G., Baaken, T., & Rampersad, G. C. (2013). The evolution of university-industry linkages - A framework. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 30(1), 21–44.

Plewa, C., & Quester, P. (2007). Key drivers of university-industry relationships: the role of organisational compatibility and personal experience. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(5), 370–382.

Plewa, C., Quester, P., & Baaken, T. (2005). Relationship marketing and university-industry linkages: a conceptual framework. Marketing Theory, 5(4), 433–456.

Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(November), 77–90.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79.

Prahalad, C. K., & Krishnan, M. S. (2008). A nova era da inovação. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy and Leadership, 32(3), 4–9.

Richardson, G. B. (1972). The organisation of industry. Economic Journal, 82(327), 883–896.

Rosell, D. T. (2014). Implementation of open innovation strategies: A buyer–supplier perspective. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(6), 1440013.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). Capitalismo, Socialismo e Democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1997). Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e o ciclo econômico. São Paulo: Nova Cultural.

Schweitzer, F. M., Buchinger, W., Gassmann, O., & Obrist, M. (2012). Crowdsourcing: Leveraging innovation through online idea competitions. Research-Technology Management, 55(3), 32–38.

Segatto-Mendes, A. P., & Rocha, K. C. (2005). Contribuições da teoria de agência ao estudo dos processos de cooperação tecnológica universidade-empresa. Revista de Administração da USP - RAUSP, 40(2), 172–183.

Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 21(1–2), 115–142.

Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2010). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 30(2), 130–141.

Sutz, J. (2000). The university-industry-government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, 29(2), 279–290.

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.

Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. G. (1994). Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23(1), 1–30.

Thorgren, S., Wincent, J., & Örtqvist, D. (2009). Designing interorganizational networks for innovation: An empirical examination of network configuration, formation and governance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(3), 148–166.

Toffler, A. (2001). A terceira onda (26th ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Record.

von Hippel, E. (1976). The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5(3), 212–239.

von Hippel, E. (1978). A customer-active paradigm for industrial product idea generation. Research Policy, 7(3), 240–266.

von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: an important source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.

von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821–833.

von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software development and the private-collective innovation model: issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 208–223.

Von Hippel, E., & Von Krogh, G. (2006). Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives. R&D Management, 36(3), 295–306.

Wallin, M. W., & Von Krogh, G. (2010). Organizing for open innovation: Focus on the integration of knowledge. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 145–154.

Werle, R. (2012). Institutions and systems: analysing technical innovation processes from an institutional perspective. In J. M. Bauer, A. Lang, & V. Schneider (Eds.), Innovation policy and governance in high-tech industries: the complexity of coordination (pp. 23–47). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

Wiener, M., Gattringer, R., & Strehl, F. (2018). Participation in inter-organisational collaborative open foresight: A matter of culture. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(6), 684–700.

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY, USA: Free Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.

Xu, Y., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E., & Gonzalez-Garcia, J. (2015). Crowdsourcing, innovation and firm performance. Management Decision, 53(6), 1158–1169.

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualisation, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.

Zwick, D., Bonsu, S. K., & Darmody, A. (2008). Putting consumers to work: “Co-creation” and new marketing govern-mentality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 163–196.